ASME 14.5M-1994 PDF

6 May I’m confused, Does an ANSI-YM document actually exist? I ordered a couple recently and got ASME-YM specifications. ASME YM This is the current standard in use in the USA today. The standard gives you more tools and vocabulary to fully describe the functional. Differences btw ANSI M and ISO. ASME . ASME YM, Mathematica1 Definition of Dimensioning and Tolerancing ASME does not ” approve.

Author: Faugor Murg
Country: Turkmenistan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 28 February 2004
Pages: 435
PDF File Size: 13.99 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.7 Mb
ISBN: 787-8-75461-923-6
Downloads: 8998
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Malarn

Resources Few production environments have the luxury of ordering new equipment to replace existing machines on their shop floor.

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. This page was last edited on 6 Novemberat I know it’s 14.5j-1994 dependent on the drawing but i’m just looking for the big obvious changes.

This article includes a list of referencesbut its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community.

Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, 14.5-m1994, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.

Don’t forget the additional fundamental rules. But then we have WhitmireGT for a historian.

Nobody has complained yet about referencing a superseeded specification. It’s easy to join and it’s free. It may be a good idea to create new drawings to a newer version of the spec though. Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. Such issues are the result of project complexity, size, uniqueness and regulation, as well as the need for virtual team collaboration.

No I haven’t what is your issue? For example, the position of a hole has a tolerance of. A lot of people still don’t know what it is. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

To control the dowels equivalently with the 94′ standard in this case one would have to use two single segment position controls rather than copying the former composite FCF. Concentricity started out as being inspected just like runout–surface to surface.

Norma ASME Y by jorge vargas on Prezi

Old dogs learning new tricks Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. As I said, I find symmetry and concentricity virtually useless, and the word is don’t use them for surface to surface control.

Then runout appeared in for surfaces, and concentricity became coaxiality control of axes of coincident surfaces of revolution RFS only. I think the real problem is that they change the xsme of the symbols when creating new ones, when they should prolly create the new symbols 14.5k-1994 the purpose they changed the old symbols too.

There are still engineering people I run into that want to use concentricity for coaxial surfaces instead of Position or Runout. Then 12 works for me.

ASME Y versus ASME YM and ANSI [Archive] – MCAD Central

The machinists do this whenever they see the funny symbols. Tolerances for the profile symbols are equal bilateral unless otherwise specified, and for the position symbol tolerances are always equal bilateral. In layman terms, what is “engineering”? The ISO standards, in comparison, typically only address a single topic at a time.

Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate.

Geometric dimensioning and tolerancing

Views Read Edit View history. Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Add a personal note: Present to your audience. A datum is a virtual ideal plane, line, point, or axis. Is it wise to leave a superseeded spec on your drawings? Best I can explain in a short notice. Constrain to simple back and forward steps.

Unfortunately stack layouts get copied too so the problem never surfaces in design DO NOT just change the spec called up on the drawing without updating the 14.5m-9194 to address the other changes. Few production environments have the luxury of ordering new equipment to replace existing machines on their shop floor.

You do understand that Y What was brought back in in 14.5m-19994 5. Blog 9 October Prezi Awards Even here though the choice isn’t immediately clear. This article is based on that standard, but other standards, such as those from the International Organization for Standardization ISOmay vary slightly.